2004 (2) KLT  906

Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.S. Radhakrishnan

Muneerul Islam Sangham v. Kunhammu

C.R.P. No.1499 of 2002

Decided on 18th June, 2004

 

Wakf Act 1995, S.87 - Bar is only against institution of suit, appeal or other legal proceedings instituted on behalf of any wakf - S.87 would not be a bar for enforcement of its rights.

 

@page-KLT907#

 

S.87 of the Wakf Act stipulates that no suit, appeal or other legal proceeding for the enforcement of any right on behalf of any wakf which has not been registered in accordance with the provisions of this Act, shall be instituted or commenced or heard, tried or decided by any Court after the commencement of the said Act.  The bar is only against institution of suit, appeal or other legal proceeding instituted on behalf of any wakf.  Only if the wakf is registered under the Act then it can maintain suit for enforcement of any of its rights.  S.87 would not be a bar for enforcement of any of its rights.        (para. 2)

 

B.G. Bidan Chandran & Lissy Devassy                      For Petitioner

 

T. Krishnan Unni                                                            For Respondents

 

 

ORDER

 

K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.

 

The question that has come up for consideration in this case is whether lack of registration of defendant Society with the Wakf Board could be set up as a bar in a suit filed for enforcement of right against the wakf?

 

2.  Plaintiffs instituted the suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant Society.  Defendant Society raised a preliminary objection that the suit is not maintainable since the plaintiffs failed to produce certificate of registration of the defendant Society with the Wakf Board.  The Court below raised the following issue:

 

Whether the Wakf Board registration of the defendant wakf is necessary for the plaintiffs to file and maintain the suit filed against the defendant wakf and its muthawalli?

 

The Court below dismissed the preliminary objection and held that the suit is maintainable and the lack of registration cannot be set up herein as a defence against the plaintiffs.  S.87 of the Wakf Act stipulates that no suit, appeal or other legal proceeding for the enforcement of any right on behalf of any wakf which has not been registered in accordance with the provisions of this Act, shall be instituted or commenced or heard, tried or decided by any Court after the commencement of the said Act.  The bar is only against institution of suit, appeal or other legal proceeding instituted on behalf of any wakf.  Only if the wakf is registered under the Act then it can maintain suit for enforcement of any of its rights.  S.87 would not be a bar for enforcement of any of its rights.  Since plaintiff in this case has filed the suit for enforcement of rights against Muneerul Islam Sangham and its office bearers, lack of registration was set up by the defendants to non suit the plaintiff.  I am of the view, such a contention cannot be accepted.  Failure to register with the Wakf is not the concern of the plaintiffs.  If such acontention is accepted that will give room for unregistered Wakf to mismanage their affairs and non registration could be set up as a shield to wriggle out of their misdeeds.

 

@page-KLT908#

 

 I am therefore in agreement with the court below that lack of registration cannot be set up as a defence so as to non suit the plaintiffs.  The revision petition is accordingly dismissed.

 



 

 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © Aabasoft Solutions 2010